by Hikari » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:03 pm
This kind of situation scares me. Does it mean Dropbox developed new features, and Asustor let its client behind, to the point the version it's based on and its features became deprecated?
Dropbox was kind to not just drop access, but clearly they were upset and wanted the client updated.
One thing is to exist a newer version and user doesn't update it. Another very different is a third party develop its own client and leave it be, outdated and lacking newer features and support.
I appreciate Asustor having the effort to develop features to its NAS. But you can't delay the support for it. Dropbox client had this message in 2014 and barely supports SMB sharing its files. Nobody at all is able to use Subversion server, and all Asustor is able to do is link somebody else's documentation, which doesn't explain how to configure it in our NAS.
What annoys me is that we don't have apt-get, yum or the sorts, neither have gcc so we can compile and install from the source. Therefore, we're totally relying on Asustor to allow us to install apps on our NAS.
I understand NAS isn't a full server, it's just a file server with some extra features, as DB server, web server, etc. Still, some features like EncFS and eCryptFS are missing, and I think they are most needed on a file server.